Shooting in RAW is the Only Way (IMHO) – Boise Idaho Photographer

It’s only been the last 6 months or so that I have been shooting in RAW. I know, I was behind and thought that all of the RAW files would take up so much space on my HD. Turns out, it is the only way to photograph if you’re wanting to do any editing.

Here is a prime example of why. Take this photo, which was exposed terribly. I had captured a great moment, but wasn’t exposed properly. Normally, I would discard this file but there was something about it that made me want to keep it. If I were to have shot in jpeg, there is no way I could keep it.

Original

I’m not going to lie, salvaging this photo did take some work – work that I do not want to spend on every single photo (especially when you’re snapping 400-500 photos per hour). That’s why I emphasize that you properly expose your images whenever possible.

By shooting in RAW I was able to adjust the exposure, white balance, and clarity in order to create these two images. You’ll notice that they have a little noise, but noise never hurt anyone. Embrace the noise!

Color Version

BW Version

Which do you like best?

I think I prefer the BW version because it gets rid of all the different color tones that were created from saving the photo.

Here is a great breakdown of RAW vs JPEG for those of you who are on the fence about it. If I wasn’t being paid to photograph people, I probably wouldn’t shoot in RAW. However, by doing so I’m able to save images in the situation that they are not properly exposed. 90% of the time it doesn’t matter that I’ve shot in RAW because most of the files are properly exposed. This is a prime example of why I do it. There might be one image I really love, but messed it up. RAW lets me fix it.

5 Responses to “Shooting in RAW is the Only Way (IMHO) – Boise Idaho Photographer”

  1. Saharra says:

    I like the black and white…but I am a BW junkie. I totally agree about RAW by the way. It has saved some otherwise unsavable photos and I could never go back. However, I would love to get a bigger memory card!

  2. Tamara Kenyon says:

    I’m actually planning on getting a bigger card as well. I currently run with 2 x 8gb cards and 2 x 2gb cards but I haven’t photographed a wedding in RAW yet. I know with the weddings I shoot around 1000 photos at least. So I’m looking into getting a 16gb card.

  3. Regina Lynn says:

    Hmmm, I can’t decide between the two… ok, B&W. :) White balance and not having to worry about it is the main reason I shoot in RAW, but it’s always great to have the option of fixing the exposure if you need too. I manually set my exposure and usually it’s right on, but sometimes, I confess, it’s lots of fun to play around with the exposure once the image is on the computer and being edited.

  4. Saharra says:

    I have two 8 gig cards and one 2 gig, but RAW takes a ton of space and it would be nice to have ONE card that could handle a wedding (even though I haven’t photographed one!) I totally hear you though…maybe a 16 or 32 gig would be ideal. I saw a 32 gig at Best Buy, but the price tag made me shudder…

  5. I actually think I like the edited color one but I also like BW. RAW is great for someone like me who still kind of sucks as a photographer so I can salvage photos as long as they are in focus. :)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Switch to our mobile site